Reflection on the impact on chemistry when creating multimodal texts that employ critical literacy and meaningful, contextualized learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66231/RedCiencia360.v3i1.24Keywords:
comprehensive cognitive acquisition, critical literacy, semiotic modesAbstract
Chemistry is often perceived as an abstract, complex discipline, far removed from the reality of students. Therefore, this article reflects on the potential of multimodal texts and critical literacy to reduce demotivation and foster meaningful, more inclusive, and contextualized learning. The study is situated in public schools in South Carolina, characterized by diverse classrooms with students facing economic hardship, learning in multiple languages, or exhibiting varying learning abilities. These factors influence how chemistry is viewed, often as irrelevant or inaccessible. The central objective is to rethink a curriculum based on memorization, standards, and institutional rigidity, incorporating innovative strategies that allow for the representation of abstract chemical phenomena through multimodal texts. The theoretical framework highlights the use of different semiotic modes and links critical literacy to prior knowledge, the classroom, problem-solving, and the social environment. It is argued that these strategies strengthen student autonomy and allow for individual learning paces. However, the analysis identifies gaps, such as a scarcity of studies in diverse contexts, a lack of teacher training, and institutional resistance. In conclusion, new ways of teaching school chemistry are proposed.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Glock Maceno, N., & Giordan, M. (2024). Evaluación multimodal en la enseñanza de la química. Educación Química, 35(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2024.2.85993
Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494418803200203
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Huda, N., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). The factors that influence the motivation to learn chemistry of upper-secondary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.615
Kieferle, S., & Markic, S. (2024). Language support in a student laboratory for chemistry in secondary school. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 14(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1605
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Pratomo, H., Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., & Marfuatun. (2025). Mapping chemistry learning difficulties of secondary school students: A cross-grade study. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21826
Wanselin, H., Danielsson, K., & Wikman, S. (2022). Analysing multimodal texts in science: A social semiotic perspective. Research in Science Education, 52, 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10027-5
Wong, S. S. H., Kim, M., & Jin, Q. (2021). Critical literacy practices within problem-based learning projects in science. Interchange, 52(4), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09426-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ana Lorena López Guisa, Edison Castrillón Ángel (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons 4.0, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a compartir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo: en repositorios institucionales o páginas web personales) antes y durante el proceso de envío del manuscrito, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos, a una mayor y más rápida citación del trabajo publicado.